Angel Chef's child policy u-turn
A RESTAURANT in Gloucester which imposed a height restriction for children to be eligible for cheaper food has reversed its policy.
The Angel Chef, in the Peel Centre, hit the headlines last month after a row over its child policy where a family had to pay adult prices as their son was too tall.
But now bosses at the popular buffet said they are doing away with the height restriction and will be classing all under 16s as children.
To celebrate the launch of the new deal the restaurant is offering a free meal for four to the first 20 families who turn up on July 4 from 11.30am.
Angel Chef boss David Lyn said the new offer aimed to make it more affordable for families to eat out during the credit crunch.
He said: "It is across all the restaurants. With the current economic crisis it is expensive to eat out and Angel Chef has always been child orientated.
"We want to encourage families to come out and not be fleeced."
He admitted the change had been influenced by The Citizen's story.
On June 3 we reported how 10-year-old Ben Gardner, from Saintbridge, was charged full price for his Chinese meal because he was too tall for a child's meal.
Ben and dad Gareth had been eating out with Gareth's partner Mandy Street and her son Lewis, nine.
Mandy said she was pleased about the restaurant's change of heart.
She said: "It is good to hear that, it is good for families. We go there because it's cheap and we can eat together as a family."
Mr Lyn said the company had proved it still had a heart by turning around its attitude.
He said: "We may have lost track of what they essentially really
are, a big family feast restaurant with big choices of food and drink
– trying to provide families a chance to have a special restaurant
experience together.
"We hope the new policy will give families what they really want and have a place to go to, be able to
feast together and where they will feel welcome without having to pay the earth."
He said the company intended to encourage the family policy by charging the lower rate for anyone under the age of 16. No ID will be required and under
16's will be accepted solely by their parent's declaration.
Unaccompanied youngsters will always have to provide some form of
proof of their age – however they intend to be very flexible in the way they exercise the scheme.













5 Comments
by William, Gloucester
Wednesday, July 01 2009, 4:02PM
“Kev, where is Blooms ? I love to go and try. Can my 15 years old son eat as much as he like for £ 3.00 ?”
by Kat, gloucester
Sunday, June 28 2009, 9:57PM
“Kev, do you mean Blossoms?”
by Kev, Abbeymead
Sunday, June 28 2009, 8:46PM
“Does that mean I will get a refund of £5.50 per head for my 15, 14, 13 and 10 year old daughters, who are all petit and eat next to nothing! We have since gone to Blooms who have always charged half price for kids on the buffet, a little more expensive but better quality and service.”
by Maggie, FoD
Saturday, June 27 2009, 10:36PM
“Oh noes!! Now the lovely buffet will be crawling with sproglets.”
by SpinalFluid, Gloucs
Saturday, June 27 2009, 4:40PM
“that's not all
there are plenty of adults who are children as well. Many MPs ,media types, public sector workers and BBC staff for example
Now they'll be able to eat too”