Badgers to be shot by marksmen in Gloucestershire
BADGERS in Gloucestershire are going to be shot by marksmen the Government announced today.
Two areas in west Gloucestershire and west Somerset have been selected to pilot a badger cull in the autumn to try and stamp out TB in cattle.
-

Badgers in the firing line
The two areas, near Tewkesbury in Gloucestershire and near Taunton in Somerset, were chosen from a shortlist put forward by the farming industry.
Six-week trials in the two areas will test the shooting of free-running badgers as part of efforts to tackle TB in cattle, a disease which ministers say will cost taxpayers around £1 billion over the next 10 years if not dealt with effectively.
The pilot, which will be paid for by farmers, will test how safe, humane and effective “controlled shooting” of badgers is, the Environment Department (Defra) said, and if successful could lead to a wider cull of badgers.
Research shows that culling badgers can lead to a 16% reduction in new infections in herds.
While farmers and the Government have said a cull is necessary to tackle the disease, proposals to kill badgers – which are a protected species – have faced strong opposition from animal welfare and wildlife groups.
Agriculture Minister Jim Paice said: “Bovine TB is a chronic and devastating disease. It causes the slaughter of tens of thousands of cattle each year, and is taking a terrible toll on our farmers and rural communities.
“Nobody wants to cull badgers. But no country in the world where wildlife carries TB has eradicated the disease in cattle without tackling it in wildlife too.”
Farmers and landowners in the pilot areas will now be able to apply for licences to Natural England as a group, with their application judged against a series of criteria before the licence is granted.
The first pilot area is mainly in the district of West Somerset and partly in Taunton Deane.
The second area is mainly within the Forest of Dean and Tewkesbury, and partly in the districts of Wychavon, Malvern Hills and West Gloucestershire
In order to be granted a licence, those taking part must demonstrate a high level of competence in marksmanship and then complete a Government-approved course.
Farmers must comply with Government TB cattle controls, and implement biosecurity measures to minimise the spread of the disease.
There must already be a high incidence of TB in cattle in the area, which must be at least 150 square kilometres (60 square miles).
The group conducting the pilot must have access to at least 70% of that area.
And they must take reasonable measures to reduce the risk of badgers moving around in response to a cull, potentially spreading the disease to the surrounding areas, for example by culling up to natural barriers such as rivers or by vaccinating badgers outside the cull area.
Mr Paice said: These two pilots are just part of a wide range of activity on bovine TB.
“We already have robust measure to control its spread amongst cattle, which we plan to strengthen further and continuing to work hard on the development of practical and usable vaccines.”
He said an independent panel of experts would monitor and evaluate the pilot culling, led by Professor Christopher Wathes, professor of animal welfare at the Royal Veterinary College.
Prof Wathes said: “Badger culling is a very sensitive issue which is why this group will be completely independent in the work they conduct.
“I will be joined by a selection of experts from a range of disciplines and our job will be to carefully consider the design and conduct of the pilots to enable a thorough examination of the humaneness, safety and effectiveness of the culling method being used.”
But Mary Creagh, shadow environment secretary, said: “For a cull to work it has to be cost-effective, humane and reduce bovine TB.
“The Government’s plans will achieve none of those things. This big society badger cull will cost farmers more than it saves them, put a huge strain on police, and will spread bovine TB in the short term as badgers move out of cull areas.
“At the end of the cull, 84% of the TB problem will still remain.”
David Bowles, RSPCA Director of Communications, said: "The RSPCA is devastated that the government is ploughing on with plans to kill badgers. This cull will be of little help in reducing the disease and could actually make things worse in some areas.
“It will wipe out huge numbers of this much-loved species, virtually eliminating badgers from these areas, including many animals which are healthy.
"We also believe that devolving power to farmers or non-statutory bodies could make the issues involved with culling badgers worse.
“It could also end up being very expensive for the farmers. According to Defra’s own impact assessment, it could end up costing farmers more than an outbreak of bovine TB on their farm would.
“The consultation document admitted that farmers could be left with a net cost, which means that the process would ultimately cost them rather than save them money. Some farmers could end up spending more money over a four-year period than an incident of bovine TB might cost them.”
Mr Bowles added: “In a meeting of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Wildlife and in conversation earlier this week, the minister said that vaccination was the long term exit strategy. We still believe that the government should be focussing its attention on being able to deliver a vaccination strategy rather than on culling badgers.”







18 Comments
View all
by Exasperated2
Saturday, February 11 2012, 10:45AM
“Shooting badgers won't help anyone. If it can be proved a sett is infected with TB why not just gas the lot and have done with it?
Scientific evidence seems to show that shooting will only make the surviving badgers roam and spread TB further. Mr Cameron says he's taken a 'difficult' decision but you might as well substitute 'wrong', 'stupid' or 'ill advised'...”
by darrglos
Friday, January 20 2012, 8:36PM
“When the Farmers have killed all the Badgers and still their livestock get TB what will they kill next?”
by 4wales
Friday, January 20 2012, 4:33PM
“Any farmer found using a shotgun on badgers using any less than a rifled slug,LG or AA shot, should be Sued for cruelty by the RSPCA. As for shooting at night, at 'free running' Badgers, Bloody madness, the population will need Body Armour.”
by Andrew_Powell
Friday, January 20 2012, 1:06AM
“Of course, the farmers will just use the 12 bores they have because they're used to them. Problem being that the effective range is 35 yards and unless it's a full choke, anything over that is likely to just wound rather than kill.
What they should be doing is testing each and every sett. if a sett is disease free, leave the bloody thing alone. This indiscriminate "cull" is madness.”
by Alchemies
Friday, January 20 2012, 12:01AM
“'Some farmers could end up spending more money over a four-year period than an incident of bovine TB might cost them'. Good, let it be a lesson.”
by meerkatmanor
Thursday, January 19 2012, 9:27PM
“'Farmers and landowners in the pilot areas will now be able to apply for licences to Natural England as a group, with their application judged against a series of criteria before the licence is granted.
In order to be granted a licence, those taking part must demonstrate a high level of competence in marksmanship and then complete a Government-approved course.'
As I said 'doddery old farmers roaming the fields with shotguns, firing at will' - nowhere does it say anything about qualified marksmen.
Custodians of the countryside, my @r$£!”
by Mikethepike
Thursday, January 19 2012, 9:14PM
“This is bad news for badgers--thousands will die or be wounded in a hail of bullets; it's bad news for local people--six weeks of night shooting using rifles with a range of a mile plus is frankly hazardous and stupid; bad news for farmers--they'll face public anger and will pay through the nose for a cull that will cost more than it will save; and it's bad news for tourism--who'll want to visit an area where every footpath might have a "marksman" nearby, and remember, many of our footpaths are in fact old badger paths. As for Jim Paice's justification it's nonsense. This slaughter isn't science-led--it's a gamble with a totally untried culling method. The claim that we can learn from the rest of the world is nonsense,too: killing millions of highly vulnerable diseased possum in New Zealand tells us nothing about the impact on UK badgers (just 300,000 of them) and how effective a cull will be. Badgers have a degree of built-in immunity; unlike possum most are disease free; and unlike other wildlife their reaction to culling is unique: they become stressed, wander more widely, and become potentially more likely to shed bacteria. Research demonstrates clearly that once a cull is over the prevalence of disease in badgers is HIGHER not lower. This proposed cull promises to be an unmitigated disaster.”
by bonzaharris1
Thursday, January 19 2012, 7:44PM
“If Barney the badger is still under our garden shed, best he stay there !”
by 2ladybugs
Thursday, January 19 2012, 6:39PM
“should be "to cull badgers"”
by 2ladybugs
Thursday, January 19 2012, 6:33PM
“Quasi2010
As not all of the countryside in the UK is going to culled of badgers there will never be a shortage of them especially if they find the vaccine works.”