Buy-to-let enquiries up 60% at Cheltenham agents
For the first time in Adams Estate Agents' history, rental enquiries have outstripped sales enquiries in Cheltenham. With buy-to-let enquiries up 60 per cent last month, managing director of the Cheltenham branch, Mark Millward, discusses the market.
What are your thoughts on the buy-to-let market, both nationally and locally?
There has been, over the past six years, a general positive shift in trend towards renting. People who have seen their pensions dwindle to unsustainable levels have decided to invest in property as a means to providing an income during retirement. This has created a need for housing and kept house prices stable. During the recession period buyers have found that mortgages are only achievable with generous deposits and therefore have turned to the rental market, of which there has been an increase in supply. The UK market is strong with no signs of abating.
Locally investors have shifted from the student market into predominantly professional lets. The hottest properties are those in good school catchment areas, property near good employment and those near good communications like the M5 or Cheltenham train station. Town centre property with parking is also rare and highly coveted.
What are the benefits of buying to let in the current market?
House prices are not cheap but they are realistic. Many investors, having looked at other higher risk investment strategies, conclude that property will be a secure place to invest. Capital growth is not the primary objective of many investors, they are looking for longer term security and a safe place for their cash.
What advice do you have for buy-to-let investors?
We offer free, comprehensive advice to all landlords and can offer more than 30 years of property industry knowledge by appointment. The best advice to any new landlord is to use the knowledge base of an experienced licensed letting agent. Do not look at property that you would like to own above the merits of one that will have a large customer base. Better a flat in the town centre with off-road parking than a trendy cottage in Tivoli. The returns are usually much higher.







8 Comments
by thomas1996
Thursday, February 02 2012, 3:37PM
“Newly formed letting agents is surely the latest 'get rich quick' start up business with minimal capital outlay (you just need a web site, maybe a leased shop unit, a car & some stationary) a few years ago these people were probably a new 'recruitment agency' before the new jobs dried up in the latest recession.
Private letting is massive now because:
1. There are no more council houses to rent & the old folks in them won't move out
2. House prices will fall as more & more people lose their jobs
3. You need £10,000+ saved up for a deposit for a mortgage, even then the banks may say no!”
by thomas1996
Thursday, February 02 2012, 3:30PM
“Surely people who rent until retirement and into old age are the SMART ones now....
There's no house they own that they are forced to sell to pay their council provided care home costs so they get a guaranteed place/s at a care home without all the heartache of having to sell their house, not to mention NO unhappy sons, daughters & grandchildren who of course won't be expecting the windfall of their share of their cash from the house sale.
It now pays to retire penniless. SORTED!”
by charlie2times
Thursday, February 02 2012, 2:52PM
“Of course there are going to be more people wanting to rent, as getting on to the property ladder is next to impossible. There is no way that renters can save either, as renting is at least as expensive as buying.
There is a ticking time bomb of people who will never be able to get a mortgage, who, upon reaching retirement age, won't be able to afford to rent privately either, so, unless there is more 'social' housing built, then homelessness will be their only 'choice'!!”
by Ms_Superstar
Thursday, February 02 2012, 1:30PM
“Buy to let? Rental enquiries, surely.
Pingu61, are you saying tenants are more likely to cause trouble than homeowners?
I resemble that remark ;)”
by pingu61
Thursday, February 02 2012, 1:21PM
“Quite agree Matt - but landlords should be - errm - motivated to act responsibly. Sensibly, this is only going to really work through legislation. Landlords must be made responsible for letting a property that is "fit for purpose" - that includes sensible levels of insulation.
You're obviously right as far as the building regs are concerned. But they're not relevent to older properties - and it's older properties that are the problem.
I know friends who pay 12 times what I do, for heating a smaller family home, but the owner of the property forbids them from doing anything about it.”
by Matt1006
Thursday, February 02 2012, 12:54PM
“pingu61 - if you want a well-insulated (and double-glazed) rental property, you need to find one that's new, and has therefore been built in accordance with the recently-updated Building Regs (the latest Approved Document L, which relates to thermal requirements, came into effect from October 2010). Older properties will have been built in accordance with the Regs of the time, but in the last few years the thermal requirements for new-builds has been increased significantly. My flat is 20 years old, and whilst it was built with CH, DG & insulation it is a long way off what would be required if it was being built today.
Buildings being converted need to comply with the Regs too, but an old building, not worked on for years (as far as the Building Regs are concerned) could be woefully inadequate in comparison to the latest Regs, but will still comply. So a modern box might not be as appealing as a nice airy apartment in a converted (30 years ago) Regency villa, but the thermal requirements between the two could be miles apart. Unless major works are being done, there is no requirement within the Building Regs for a landlord to upgrade a building thermally, and if the tenant is paying the bills, why (as you point out) would the landlord want to spend thousands on new central heating and/or new double glazing?
Do agree that landlords could (should?) provide their contact details to neighbours so that if there is a problem the landlord can be made aware of it. Whether he/she then acts on the information received is another matter.”
by pingu61
Thursday, February 02 2012, 11:55AM
“I guess it's a free market. However I have two requirements that landlords should comply with before letting.
Decent levels of insullation and double glazing must be a legal requirement. Tenants are usually forbidden to install this sort of thing (or may not be in a property long enough to see a return on investment, or may not be able to afford them), and landlord have no reason to because they don't pay the energy bills.
Another requirement on landlords, should be that all adjoining properties receive regular reminders of the landlords contact details (ideally updated once a year). If neighbours have problems with the property or bad tenants, they must have somewhere they can complain.”
by Library_User
Thursday, February 02 2012, 10:13AM
“"We offer free, comprehensive advice ..." - this is an advertisement, not a news item.”