GCHQ boss speaks exclusively to Gloucestershire Media on his retirement
AT the end of July, I retire from GCHQ after a career of
nearly 36 years and over five years as the director. Although
GCHQ is Cheltenham's largest employer, and one of the largest
in the county, it is pretty mysterious for those who do not
work there.
So I am very pleased to have this opportunity to offer some
personal reflections on GCHQ past and present and on my own
time there.
I joined GCHQ in 1972 in the middle of the Cold War, a
struggle in which GCHQ played a major part.
At that time, there were still people there who had worked
at Bletchley Park during the Second World War; their
contribution was still secret then, but is now well known.
Today GCHQ is again playing a vital role in countering
today's biggest threats to national security – helping the
fight against terrorism and supporting British troops wherever
they are deployed.
The change in GCHQ that has been most visible to Cheltenham
residents has, of course, been the move into our new Benhall
building (the Doughnut) and the replacement of much of our old
accommodation by houses and the Oakley Sainsbury's.
For many of our old hands, the experience of buying
groceries on the spot where we had our first recruitment
interview still feels pretty odd.
The Doughnut is important as a building, but the changes in
recent years go much deeper than that.
The GCHQ I first knew was very much a Cold War
organisation.
We were very hierarchical, with a rather rigid structure and
limited internal communications. This is not a criticism – the
work we did during that period was excellent, and our response
to crises such as the Falklands War could be first class.
The organisation was a product of its time, and well suited
to the job it had to do. But by the 1990s it became clear that
a different approach was needed for a very different world,
with volatile and global threats and the arrival of the
internet.
Since then the organisation has been transformed almost
beyond recognition.
The accommodation is a big part of this. Rather than a large
number of mostly old-fashioned and cellular buildings, most
people are now under one roof in modern open-plan offices – no
one, including me, has a personal office.
But as a result of all the work we have done on our culture,
our leadership, and the way we work, attitudes and behaviour
have changed as well.
We are far less concerned about rank and hierarchy,
information and knowledge move around more freely, and we are
much better able to respond to the urgent needs of today's
world. Our targets have changed as well, of course.
The Cold War focus was on the Soviet Union. Now our biggest
area of work by far is our contribution to
counter-terrorism.
And support to deployed British forces has become a major
activity. One of the many things I am proud of about GCHQ is
the number of people who volunteer to serve in Iraq and
Afghanistan, to work alongside the military in conditions that
are always very uncomfortable and often dangerous.
In that part of our business that protects government
communications and data, we are now at the heart of efforts to
protect government networks from intrusion and attack.
I am sometimes asked what a typical day in GCHQ is like.
It's an impossible question, really, because every day is
different, and because there are so many different jobs being
done. But one constant feature for some of us is the 8.30am
briefing on current events. The staff working overnight on the
24-hour watch bring us up to date with the latest intelligence
stories, and we look at what is happening in the world and what
we need to be doing about it.
This is an important reflection of our mindset – we are
supporting the Government and our armed forces on a daily and
hourly basis.
Although we are based in Cheltenham, we have to spend a lot
of time meeting and talking to our customers in Whitehall and
elsewhere – the people who use the intelligence and information
we produce.
So there is a great deal of travel between Cheltenham and
London. My own week revolves around Wednesday meetings – the
Cabinet Secretary brings together the heads of all the
government departments for an hour in the morning, and in the
afternoon the Joint Intelligence Committee meets to agree the
week's intelligence assessments that will go to Ministers.
And much of my time is spent working with the heads of the
other agencies, MI5 and MI6, to ensure that the three
organisations are working ever more closely together –
something that is essential in today's fight against
terrorism.
Alongside these internal changes, our public profile has
also changed dramatically. In 1972, we did not own up to our
intelligence role – government policy was not to admit that the
UK intercepted foreign communications in peacetime.
That did not change until 1983, after the former GCHQ
employee Geoffrey Prime was convicted of spying for the KGB –
an event that was a great shock to us all.
Since then we have steadily become more open – not, of
course, about the detail of our work, but about aspects that
are of genuinely wider interest, such as our experiences in
managing radical change and in moving an enterprise of several
thousand people across town.
The other side of the coin of openness is our greater
readiness now to take in ideas and advice from the outside
world. We are still predominantly, and I believe rightly, a
career organisation.
But we now welcome a significant number of people into GCHQ
in mid-career, including members of our board, and for the last
six years we have had three non-executive board members whose
experience in industry and elsewhere has been vital in guiding
our development in the last few years.
An important aspect of our public profile is our engagement
with the local community. We used to be very isolated,
operating behind our barbed wire and keeping the world at bay.
This construction of our new building forced us to become more
open – we had to engage in the planning process, and we were
keen to behave as “good neighbours” during a period when being
one of our neighbours involved lots of dust, noise and
disruption. One thing has led to another, and our approach to
the community is now much more open, and I believe much
healthier.
It has always been true that many of our staff have been
involved as individuals in community and charity activities,
but now we engage as GCHQ. This includes work with schools on
IT and languages, and support to community work in Hester's
Way, Springbank and Oakley.
I am very pleased with what we now feel able to do, and hope
it will continue.
We have always relied on the support we get from the
Cheltenham community, including the local newspapers, even when
they knew almost nothing about us.
Today I hope and believe that we have a fuller relationship
in which we are able to reflect back some of that support.
What will I remember after I leave? Too many things to list,
of course, and much that I can't describe here. But there are
some very vivid memories from recent years. Being summoned to
Robin Cook's office the day after the 1997 election to be given
instructions to negotiate the return of the national trade
unions to GCHQ; escorting the Queen round the Doughnut on the
day of the official opening; rushing to London on July 7, 2005,
blue lights flashing, to attend the Prime Minister's emergency
meeting after the London bombings; flying over Afghanistan in
an RAF helicopter that had once belonged to the Soviet Air
Force; ducking for cover in Basra and Baghdad as rockets landed
not far way; sitting in London's Guildhall at the Lord Mayor's
banquet for President Sarkozy; and on and on.
Above all, I will remember the people – my colleagues and
friends. In 36 years, a lot has changed. But some things
haven't. Our people are skilful, deeply committed and often
passionate about their work.
They do the country proud. And I am enormously proud to have
worked as one of them for a full career, and to have had the
privilege of leading them for my last five years.
I wish my successor, Iain Lobban, every success, and as much
pleasure as I have had in the post he is about to occupy.













Comments