Gloucester councillors welcome education shake up
Plans to create a "true community comprehensive school" in Gloucester have moved a step closer.
Gloucester City Council has voted to support the creation of a city academy to replace Central Technology College and Bishops' College.
-

MESSAGE: Elsa Harris with her children Harvey Lawrence, four, Abbie Lawrence, seven, Josh Lawrence,11,and Toby Lawrence,13,protesting against the proposed closure of Bishops' College on Estcourt Road in Gloucester on Friday.
The proposals have sparked a wave of protests from parents – and senior clergy – who want to save Bishops' College.
Bishop of Gloucester Michael Perham said last night: "I think the official position of the Diocese and my own position is in three parts.
"Part one is that we do think the Government has been foolish in deciding to close Bishops' College without giving it longer to flourish.
"Secondly we think an academy could well be a real opportunity for Gloucester and for the children who are at Bishops' College and we are supportive of that but thirdly, we do think the timescale of having the academy by September is foolish.
"We think it should be slower so it can be sorted out with greater consultation and care."
The shake-up of the city's education system follows a report by Government inspector Graham Badman who has suggested the creation of a single city academy with up to £25m of Government money.
At a meeting of Gloucester City Council on Thursday, councillors backed the proposals.
Councillor Kate Haigh (Lab, Matson and Robinswood) introduced the debate with a motion which called for a new "true community comprehensive" for the city.
She said: "The young people of the city need to reach their full potential if the city is to continue to grow and to thrive.
"The academy is not only an investment in the education of our children but also an economic and social investment, bringing jobs, facilities and a community focus where they are needed most.
"This is an emotive issue, but what is important is that young people are given the opportunity they have been denied for so long, and I ask you to support this."
Councillor Paul James (Con, Longlevens), leader of the council, said: "We have no issue with the principle of an academy and believe it could be good for the city, and we certainly cannot leave things as they are.
"However, I do not believe we can make any hard and fast decisions without a full appraisal and consultation."
The council's Liberal Democrat group were not in favour of the motion.
Councillor Jeremy Hilton (Kingsholm & Wotton), said: "I do believe there is a need to do something about the quality of education in Gloucester to ensure the children can get what they deserve.
"However, I am not sure if these proposals are the right way to do this."
Councillor Steve Morgan (Con, Grange) said: "It is obvious something must be done here.
"Consultation must be held, but if I was a parent thinking about sending a child to a school I would expect the council to act and to act decisively."
The motion was carried, with both Labour and Conservative councillors supporting it, and the Liberal Democrat group voting against.
Jane Miles, parent governor and leader of Bishops' Colleges's parent voice group Impact said that they will continue to fight to keep the college open.
She said: "I am unsure whether the city councillors voting are fully aware of all the facts at Bishops'. They should leave this school alone and concentrate on the others who have not been so fortunate with help from elsewhere.
"If any academy were put in Gloucester I suggest it is filled with children that want to be there, rather than our children that love their place of learning and belonging."











13 Comments
View all
by michealslatter, gloucester
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 2:37PM
“ave bishops college”
by anon, gloucester
Monday, November 30 2009, 10:08PM
“This process has been a complete joke from the start. Wrong data, rushed deadlines and bad communication between the LA and the schools concerned. What's wrong with education, is that education isn't being allowed to be run by people in education. Apparently these days anyone can sit in an office, look at a spreadsheet and make an informed decision. But if this were the case, the parents, staff and students of BC wouldn't be up in arms.
Has it come to the point where normal people no longer get a say in the world in which they live in?”
by Jane Miles, Bishops' Parent
Monday, November 30 2009, 9:25PM
“If the people of Gloucester were for one moment sucked in by what the LA and politicians are proposing then surely they can see from the previous commment that we as parents have spent much time and effort ensuring that we know what we're talking about!! After all it is us as parents that have the best interest of our children at heart no matter how 'caring' the LA or politicians pretend to be!! Do not ruin our children's future to fulfill your political and or financial agendas!! SAVE BISHOPS' COLLEGE!!!!”
by Save Bishops, Gloucester
Monday, November 30 2009, 7:54PM
“How it is possible to vote on such a potentially life changing situation for the pupils concerned without proper and effective consultation is insane. The councillors clearly have no idea of the stunning work undertaken by the dedicated staff and management of Bishops' College which ensures Every Child Matters.
It is not possible to ensure that all are in a clear position to comment as to the effectiveness of a future Academy without clearer details as to the nature, ethos and also community dimension of the proposed academy. If throwing money at a new building is deemed to be the answer, take a look at the failing academies around the country where so called innovative approaches to teaching and learning are not sustained beyond their initial Ofsted inspection leading to a demise in standards.
The pastoral wellbeing and security of the pupils at Bishops is paramount. Many parents have chosen to send their children there as they know that their specific needs will be catered for and every child will be encouraged to achieve their potential. Not every Bishops pupil has the potential to achieve at the National Challenge threshold, but what they achieve as young responsible adults will carry them on to become successes in life.
There is clearly a bigger and more underhand issue and also one of ethical and moral justice which is concerned more with politics and money than choice and opportunity.
The councillors and LA need to consider the impact this is having on the morale of the pupils, especially those studying for exams, as well as the feelings of the staff and management who, even through the current challenges, are striving to do their best.
Invest in rather than sweep away! All a new building will do is be a superficial flagship for a failing LA who's morals and ethics are totally reprehensible.
Children need stability and security in order to fulfil their potential. Bishops provides this, the LA does not.
Visit the school website and see the responses from the Senate, parents and governors.
Become aware of the great work that is happening and the future potential Bishops has if it is only given the chance to demonstrate what it offers within the 5 year time frame initially established by the LA and Diocese. Don't allow yourself to become as ignorant as those who have no understanding or comprehension of the reality and have their own selfish agendas.
See for yourself and don't dwell and judge on the past history of what is essentially a building and name (Oxtalls) - time has brought changes and successes. Save Bishops!”
by Jonnygolightly, glos
Monday, November 30 2009, 7:24PM
“Bring back corporal punishment I say, then it wouldn't matter WHAT the school was, learning would improve because behaviour and discipline would be enforced.”