Gloucestershire in care timebomb
A ticking time bomb of a rising number of elderly people in Gloucestershire could see huge cutbacks in care services, say social welfare bosses.
The number of over-75s in the county is predicted to rise by 70 per cent, from approximately 52,000 now to 86,000 by 2025, squeezing the budget to the limit.
-

Nathan Nightingale
The county council has pledged to treat care services for older people as a “top priority for investment”, but admits the strain on its purse will be a “serious challenge” and is reviewing the services it provides.
The authority is already helping 50 per cent more people this year to live independently in their own homes and has reduced the waiting list to receive care at home by 60 per cent.
It is also helping 25 per cent more carers this year, including family members and friends.
County council chief executive Peter Bungard said: “With so many more customers, it is the biggest growth pressure on our budget.
“Much of our thinking is about how we find more resources and the right strategies to provide support and care for people as they get older.”
The number of people with disabilities is also set to rise from 10,827 in 2008 to an estimated 12,311 in 2025.
The county council’s social care budget for 2010/11, including budgets from Government grants, is £158 million. Older people’s services take a slice of around £72 million. The authority is investing an extra £7.1 million in the care of increased numbers of older people, those with physical disabilities and people with learning difficulties, for 2010/11, compared with 2009/10.
The council’s main services for older people are focused on helping them stay in their own homes, independently and safely. They include delivering meals to older and vulnerable people, giving advice and information and signposting services provided by village agents.
The agents are jointly funded by the county and the NHS but run by Gloucestershire Rural Community Council and – to help with personal care – home support workers.
Services at day centres to give social activities and emergency support for individuals and carers are also on the list.
The county council is working on a blueprint for people over 50 whom it says must be prepared for old age but have an important community role to play in later life.
Council leader Barry Dare said: “Public authorities can often assume older people contacting them need care support and shape their response accordingly.
“In fact, their needs and interests are as diverse as any other person’s.
“We need to make sure we don’t put people in the ‘needy and dependent’ pigeonhole too soon and all our mainstream services are able to be used easily by people well into older age.
“We should ensure those aged 50-plus can get the advice they need to make the choices that face them.”
Christina Snell, from Age Concern Gloucestershire, said its services would feel a knock-on effect as demand grew, and would have to grow accordingly.
She said: “We’re a charity and we’re set up to plug the gaps. As the pressure continues to increase on the statutory sector we’ll have to pick up more and more.
“We all have to take responsibility for ourselves and plan for old age.
“Older people can have a lot to contribute, lots of them are involved in volunteering and contribute to the economy in caring for the grandchildren.”
When 92-year-old Nathan Nightingale had part of his leg amputated shortly after the death of his beloved wife Eileen, he would have been forgiven for wanting to give up.
But with his indomitable spirit and help from home support workers, he is now determined to drive his car and even walk again.
Mr Nightingale, from Bishop’s Cleeve, said: “They were the best services you could have.”
The carers helped to bring out the fighting side of the fiercely independent pensioner, who had been a staff sergeant in World War II.
He said the loss of his leg, which followed a period of pain, had been a big blow.
He said: “The doctor said to take a couple of paracetamol, but my daughter said we were going to Cheltenham General.
“The doctor told me he was going to give me the thrill of my life – sending me in an ambulance to Gloucestershire Royal Hospital with sirens and blue lights flashing.
“They found I’d had an aneurism and the surgeon said my leg below the knee had to come off, and quickly. About 12 hours later, it had all gone.”
After six weeks’ recuperation, Mr Nightingale came home. He said: “I’m not one for getting depressed – if something’s going to happen, it’s going to happen.
“I had a wheelchair and could still cook and make my bed, but a lady came in every morning at 8am to get me up and dressed.
“I don’t think she did it once because I’d managed it. They were absolutely splendid and they’d do anything you’d ask them to do. I’m 92 and it’s harder to do things now, but I’m going to give it my best shot to walk again and I’ve a very nice car in the drive I’d like to drive again.”







7 Comments
by David Reynolds, Up Hatherley
Thursday, March 11 2010, 8:45AM
“Perhaps David Hall's Care Village idea was not such a bad idea after all? More beds and better attention.”
by Holly Dayene, Glos
Wednesday, March 10 2010, 3:09PM
“Agree with all previous comments.
However, the article is a bit vague.
It says....'The authority is already helping 50 per cent more people this year.....
..........It is also helping 25 per cent more carers this year'.
Are these increases since last year?
Also, the 'scare figure' of 52,000 to 86,000 is over the next fifteen years, and isn't 70% it's less than 66%, so that's about 4.5% per annum, so it's not as big a time bomb as imagined.
With retirement pushed back, healthy people will be putting in the pot, not taking out.
Stop the public sector early retirements and we'll all be OK!”
by pam, gloucester
Wednesday, March 10 2010, 1:23PM
“What I find incredible about all of this is the fact that no provision has been made for elderly care by succesive governments over the last 20 years (Conservative for 7 and Labour for 13).We the taxpayer pay civil servants god knows how much money to produce statistics for this, statistics for that and yet no one has said, hang on a minute here, all of these people have been born over the last 60 years, plus all the immigrants, they are going to need care and pensions and benefits. It will get worse as we are going to have less people in work supporting more and more people who are pensioners, unemployed or who are just too bone idle to work. Elderly people who maybe have worked all their lives have to sell their homes to pay for their care.People who work over pension age have to pay tax on the pension they receive so they are still contributing to the national economy. I agree with Mal, Shire resident and Geoff, it is about time elderly people were given the care and respect they deserve not used as a political football for the politicians to score points off one another and a government that has a clear and positive strategy to deal with care for the elderly, but I am not holding my breath!”
by Sandra, Gloucester
Wednesday, March 10 2010, 1:19PM
“Indeed , I agee with previous comments .
It's a long awaited wake up call for not only politicians but society in general .
The majority of those reaching or approaching retirement have worked hard all their lives and most have paid into pension plans or have saved hard . However, through no fault of their own many are finding their estimated pension is a fraction of what they were expecting, and those relying on interest from savings are finding the same . This is quite apart from Gordon Brown having raided their pension pots.
Many are questioning whether they have been very foolish in planning ahead , when they see others who have been less frugal appear to be getting a better deal from the Pension Credit system whilst they are being penalised .
Hindsight is wonderful , but what is done is done .
Society needs to urgently debate a way forward for those who are sick and need care and find a way of funding which is fair to all .
Society also needs to be aware and understand the everyday needs of all older people when it comes to mobility, transport and leisure . All extremely important issues to prevent the feeling of isolation and it turn lonliness and depression. In a fast ,modern society it is far too easy to ignore or belittle these needs .”
by Geoff, Cheltenham
Wednesday, March 10 2010, 12:02PM
“Here here! Shire and Mal. It is a sad reflection on our so called society that we need to endlessly debate and spin this issue.”
by Shire resident, The Hobbit Hole.
Wednesday, March 10 2010, 11:55AM
“The frail and elderly can't be much of a priority for the electorate as despite the County Council getting a blistering report on these services before the election last year, the administration was returned with a whopping majority. I think people nowadays vote entirely out of self interest, maybe there really is "no such thing as society" anymore.”
by Mal, Local
Wednesday, March 10 2010, 10:26AM
“The 3 main political parties are making it worse by not working together to come up with a viable way of looking after our older citizens.
Instead of throwing insults at each other,they should aim to serve the people. 'Oh! Can't do that,it's not our policy. ' seems to be the mindset with our politicians (of all colours).
Well,they'd better get their acts together,as a General Election is fast approaching and none of them have their paddles in the same boat as the normaly ignored voter.”