Lorries set to be banned in Cotswold beauty spots

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

This is Gloucestershire

HUNDREDS of lorries look set to be diverted through a notorious accident blackspot as part of a plan to keep HGVs out of the Cotswolds.

Gloucestershire County Council looks likely to implement measures designed to stop lorries weighing more than 7.5 tonnes from being driven through much of the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Although the plans have been welcomed in some picturesque villages plagued by HGVs, their respite comes at the expense a bottleneck at Nettleton Bottom and the Air Balloon roundabout on the A417.

The authority's management zone, proposed by its traffic regulation committee, would be brought in at the end of the year if approved by cabinet.

Except for deliveries, lorries weighing more than 7.5 tonnes will be banned from using the A46 between Stroud and Brockworth, the A4173 between Pitchcombe and Brookthorpe, the B4008 between Stonehouse and Hardwicke, and the A435 between Seven Springs and Cirencester, as short cuts.

It means an extra 34 lorries a day are forecast to file through the Air Balloon junction and Nettleton Bottom on the A417, with 162 more on the A419 at Stonehouse and 68 more at Stroud.

Paula Hewitt, manager of the Air Balloon, said: "Lorries do cause a lot of congestion here. There are quite a lot of accidents and it's always lorries.

"We have hundreds of lorries go past every day. The council has put a monitoring station here, so they are concerned about pollution."

Mike Farmer, Midlands and western regional director of the Road Haulage Association told councillors at Shire Hall there were too many holes in the £500,000 scheme to make it work.

He said: "What concerns us is that the reductions envisaged are, in the words of your own report, 'modest'. We don't believe that stands up to expenditure of £500,000.

"Three-fifths of lorries will still be in this area quite legitimately.

"Public perception will be that it's not working."

He said taking HGVs off the A46 and A435 would increase pressure on the Air Balloon roundabout near Birdlip, and questioned the police's ability to enforce the zone.

He said: "Something like 100 lorries a day go down the B4008.

"If we cannot enforce one road, how on earth can you enforce a whole zone?

"The police have no sanction against foreign vehicles in this zone either, short of arresting them and taking them to court."

Police traffic manager Clive Fluck backed the scheme but said the force's response would be reactive to complaints from the public, admitting there would be no extra money to police it.

He said: "We have a finite resource and we will respond to complaints."

The restrictions could see the county's CO2 emissions rise by 0.5 per cent because of vehicles making longer journeys, but councillors believed it was a price worth paying because of the impact large lorries have on villages.

The zone could cut lorry trips through Painswick by up to 40 per cent and by 30 per cent between Seven Springs and Cirencester.

If implemented, the council would install restriction signs on the roads and notify major haulage companies.

Coun Shaun Parsons (C. South Cotswold) said: "All the parishes in my area strongly welcome this proposal.

"They are concerned though, about what can be done about traffic being diverted when there is a jam at Nettleton Bottom. At the moment, they go through the Duntisbournes and other villages."

Painswick Parish Council chairman Terry Parker added: "The throughput of HGVs has a detrimental effect on the environment of Painswick, and those living on the A4173 at Edge."

14
Tweet this article
Report

14 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Alex, Selsley East

    Sunday, November 23 2008, 2:17PM

    “I live on Selsley Hill (B4066) and have written to the local Highways auhority and rang them several times about the size and scale of lorries driving on the pavement at speed through the village but never got a reply, so I would welcome any restrictions across the County as a whole. I own a Gloucestershire based transport company so have some insight regarding the problems.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by David Broad, Chedworth

    Sunday, October 19 2008, 1:29AM

    “This is a bad scheme not thought through properly.
    Lorries delivering or collecting within the Zone are still allowed so
    Apart from the A435 which is perfectly capable of handling 44T HGVs and does take M4 to Cheltenham traffic, the Order will have little effect, the Lorries getting stuck will be delivering within the zone and will continue to get stuck and clog up the roads.
    It is a disgraceful waste of money if it does indeed cost £ 500 000 but even at £1000 its still a waste of public money which is desperately needed for
    Ambulances Hospitals Plastic recycling etc.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Union Man, Kemble.

    Sunday, October 19 2008, 1:19AM

    “Come on Councillors
    There is a need to reduce Co2 and you propose sending Lorries on a great big detour to save them using the A435 a perfectly good 44 Tonne HGV road up the Churn Valley.
    Which Planet are the proposers of this plan living on.
    Get educated.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by John Cordwell, Gloucestershire

    Thursday, October 16 2008, 8:28AM

    “The Citizen report failed to mention that the committee agreed the recommendation only by 4-3. The intention to reduce lorries allowed on three "A" roads in the area to 7.5 tonnes gross weight rather than a more sensible 18 tonnes that I proposed was simply to increase the numbers diverted so that the £500k cost of the order plus ongoing costs could be claimed to be value for money. How independent could the committee's recommendation be when four of its members have signed up to a manifesto commitment to introduce the ban?”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by James, Cotswolds

    Wednesday, October 15 2008, 9:13PM

    “Somebody at the council gets paid far to much money to come up with these stupid ideas.

    GCC state they are monitering the traffic but have they forecast the impact on the haulage industry??? I very much doubt it!!!
    Once again the haulage industry comes last.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters