Residents want wind mast plans thrown out

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

This is Gloucestershire

Plans for a huge wind monitoring mast near Tewkesbury have sparked mass opposition.

The borough council has received 144 letters from people living close to the proposed site, to the east of Brockeridge Common, near Twyning.

At 70 metres, the mast would be nearly one-and-a-half times the height of Tewkesbury Abbey.

It would be supported by four sets of seven guy wires, which would be attached to eight steel reinforced anchors.

Wind Prospect Developments Ltd wants to install it for two years to measure wind speed and direction. It would use the information as part of its plan to have three massive wind turbines at nearby Upper Strensham.

An application for the turbines has yet to be submitted, but is expected shortly.

Residents opposed to the project fear if the wind monitoring mast is allowed, it would make it more likely that the turbines would be too.

Although the mast would be much smaller than the 126m turbines, villagers still feel it would spoil the countryside.

They say it would be above the tree line of Harbour Wood and would be "highly visible".

Objectors also fear the mast could pose a health risk to people using footpaths in the area, distract motorists on the nearby M50 and intrude into air space used by the County Air Ambulance and other aircraft.

Twyning, Ripple and Strensham parish councils have all objected to the application, which will be considered by the borough's planning committee on January 6.

But in a report to councillors, planning officers are recommending approval.

They say: "Given the wider economic and social benefits that could possibly be achieved with renewable energy, it is considered that the proposed mast for a temporary period of two years would have an acceptable impact on the landscape."

The officers say the mast would not pose a risk to residents' health and would not distract motorway drivers or impact on aircraft.

Strensham Wind Action Group is fighting the planned wind turbines as it fears they would be an eyesore, noisy and might devalue homes.

It has collected hundreds of names on a petition, calling for them to be placed at least 2km away from Upper Strensham.

Wind Prospect says the turbines would provide clean and green electricity.

It says the monitoring mast would provide it with detailed and site specific information about the wind in the area.

David Wallbank, chairman of SWAG, said residents were right to be wary of the mast.

He said: "It will only lead to a further application for the wind farm itself.

"I'm concerned the council has got its mind made up on this, regardless of what local people think."

5
Tweet this article
Report

5 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by confused of tewkesbury, tewkesbury

    Wednesday, January 07 2009, 9:21AM

    “It is easy to laugh when someone else rather than yourself is affected. Would you like your house devalued? I don't see the self-righteous like "Objection Honestly" offering to host wind masts.
    Why has the principal landowner stipulated that no turbines should be built near him in the contract? That speaks volumes.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Dave Luckett, Twyning

    Friday, January 02 2009, 9:49PM

    “DW - I think the air ambulance and RAF know where Bredon Hill is, trouble is the mast will be difficult to see from the air. Jimmy, you have been reading the BWEA propaganda! You pay £60 a year for the privilege of subsidising these wind turbines which produce one of the most costly form of electricity, but only when the wind blows. O.H. I doubt the apples are at risk, but the low frequency noise turbines produce can seriously do your head in.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by DW, Tewkesbury

    Friday, January 02 2009, 12:47PM

    “If a mast may interfere with the Aiir ambulance, perhaps we should consider levelling Bredon Hill as well!”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Jimmy, Quedgeley

    Wednesday, December 31 2008, 10:37AM

    “Are these the same people who put out recycling and moan about fuel costs? Surely their pretty little villages were once fields and lanes, and could at the time of building have been viewed as a blot on the landscape. The benefits very substansially outweigh the fact that some villagers may have the inconvenience of viewing a construction from their window. They probably are not local anyway, as locals cannot afford to stay in the area.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Objection!, Honestly...

    Tuesday, December 30 2008, 9:50PM

    “Health risk to pedestrians???

    Whatelse could be listed???

    It may affect the apples growing on my trees
    It may affect my choice of socks in the morning
    It may stop me eating sausages on a wednesday

    It must be fun being at some of the planning meetings when they read the objections! I bet they have a top 10 of funniest objections!”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters