Supporters give a rousing Tally-ho to hunting season
Support for hunting is stronger than ever as the new season begins, claim Gloucestershire enthusiasts.
They say high turnouts of more than 40,000 people riding out in more than 250 meets across the country on the opening day last weekend were mirrored in the county.
-

And supporters say they will fight on to repeal the 2005 Hunting Act – and are pinning their hopes on a David Cameron-led Tory government.
The Act allows dogs to be used to follow a scent or flush a fox out of cover, but not to kill it – though the act adds the law has not been broken if the fox is killed unintentionally.
Cotswold Hunt joint master Rosemary Vestey said: "Support now is strong, if not stronger, than ever.
"We had a huge turnout of 120 mounted followers and a great many on foot at our first meet.
"The hunting and country community came out in force because they really truly believe this is an iniquitous law.
"We feel repeal is just around the corner and I'm putting hope in David Cameron as this law has no place on the statute book.
"We are hunting within the law and doing the best under the circumstances, but we'll carry on exploiting every possible loophole in the law.
"We have to ensure hunting is still around for the next generation."
Robert Warner, of the Cotswold Vale Farmers Hunt, which covers a wide swathe of land across Cheltenham, Gloucester and Tewkesbury, said support had not diminished.
He said: "We probably have more people out now than we used to.
"We're a small hunt, on average we get about 25 to 30 people. But we had 60 out the other day.
"It's not the thrill of the kill which draws people in, it's the thrill of riding across country.
"People are realising hunting is good fun and do seem to enjoy being out in the countryside and seeing the hounds work.
"Loads of kids also enjoy coming out.
"I'm a farmer who just enjoys his hunting – it's something farmers have lived with all our lives.
"The 'antis' still come out. They haven't appeared yet this season, but they will. They're as determined to find the hunters as we are to find the scent.
"But they just want to spoil our fun and are mainly louts."
The Countryside Alliance said hunts had signalled their intention to continue to press for the ban to be repealed.
Wildlife rescuer Paul Richardson, from Oak and Furrows centre, in Somerford Keynes, condemned hunters in general for being propagandists.
He said: "They say they're getting more followers, but they've got no more support than before and I've followed the hunt enough times.
"They always talk up their cause to make it look good. And the hunts may say they're not killing foxes, but they are.
"As to claiming to laying a trail instead – I've seen them coming down the A40 and blocking the road off. Would they have laid a trail along there?"







44 Comments
View all
by Gloucestershire Hunt Sabs, Gloucestershire
Sunday, January 11 2009, 8:47AM
“will* whoops”
by Gloucestershire Hunt Sabs, Gloucestershire
Sunday, January 11 2009, 8:45AM
“Hey guys, how did you like us lot at your last meet? Glad you packed up early though, the foxes were thank you!”
by Giles Bradshaw, Rose Ash
Friday, November 07 2008, 1:35PM
“Bored of Cheltenham
I use a way to reduce the damage deer do to my property that does them less harm than killing them. I just take my dogs down to the wood and flush them out.
Unfortunately under the Hunting Act this is now only legal if I shoot the deer.
It's a deeply stupid law.”
by Gill Purser, Cheltenham
Friday, November 07 2008, 12:40PM
“Hi Bored of Cheltenham,
It is totally unnatural for a fox to find himself in a confined space with a large numbers of poultry. Out in the wild, he'd be lucky to stumble across one and any others in the vicinity would naturally have the chance to flee. However, man interferes, as usual, confines lots of birds in one place, fails to use his supposed 'superior intelligence' to make it fox proof and then throws his hands up in horror because the fox follows his instincts to hunt for food!
One cannot expect an animal like a fox, finding itself in the middle of a load of squawking hens who are unable to escape because of the incompetence of their keeper, to pause and think 'Umm, maybe I should take just one of these for my supper'. He's programmed by Mother Nature to make the most of it and, left to his own devices, he would come back and take each carcase and bury it as a 'larder' for when times are hard. That sort of forward planning deserves respect, not scorn.
In answer to your 'total ban' question, there have been proper drag and bloodhound packs in existence for a very long time presenting the same spectacle as the fox hunts but without the cruelty of hounding a wild animal to a brutal death. Nobody has ever suggested that they should be 'banned' so there's no debate to be had about disposal of horses and hounds because it will not arise.
Lastly, contact the Humane Wildlife Deterrence Society or the Fox Project or electric fencing suppliers for non-lethal methods of fox control.”
by Bored, Cheltenham
Friday, November 07 2008, 10:57AM
“Ian you must never have seen an animal kill another animal. There is clearly enjoyment in the act.
If what you say is true why does the fox kill all the birds then leave them. Surely he would think about other preditors coming and stealing its prey?
What about house hold cats? Have you never seen one play with a mouse kill it then just leave it? Killing and the thril of the chase is fun for animals!
One more question for the antis if you want a total ban what do you supose we do with all the horses and hounds? Ground down for dog food?
Also could you give me a way of disposing of a fox that causes them less harm?”
by Quasi, Cheltenham
Thursday, November 06 2008, 8:31PM
“Goodnight Almo, nice to see you know when your beat.”
by Almo, FoD
Thursday, November 06 2008, 8:00PM
“Quasi, thank you for your comment. I'm not really interested in a game of ping-pong/tennis/whatever, but you did infer in your original comment that people committing criminal acts ought to have their tools of commital confiscatred. My response was meant to refer to such criminal acts as speeding. Anyone who speeds, does so knowing that they are liable to casue death.
Anyhoo, can't spend to much time engaging in rivetting idle cvhatter, as the hounds need feeding, traps need setting etc etc”
by Against Hunting, Cheltenham
Thursday, November 06 2008, 7:53PM
“I agree entirely with the previous comment re the Echo's headline & reporting being very pro hunt. This subject was heavily debated on this site recently & it is obvious that the general consensus of opionion, across the so -called class structure, is that this despicable passtime IS NOT ACCEPTABLE to the majority of our society, where ever they may live.”
by Quasi, Cheltenham
Thursday, November 06 2008, 7:33PM
“Almo. If you are caught driving without tax or insurance your car will be impounded at the roadside, parkind illegally can result in your car being clamped or towed which is a temporary confiscation. Excessive speeding will result in a jail sentence.
Suggest you take your own advice and engage brain before making your hilariously pithy comments.”
by Mrs, Broadway
Thursday, November 06 2008, 7:26PM
“I am totally against fox hunting and believe the ban should stay in place. It is cruel and a totally out of date so called sport.”