BREAKING NEWS
 

Thousands of tenants across Gloucestershire braced for 'bedroom tax' hit

Trusted article source icon
Monday, March 11, 2013
Profile image for Gloucestershire Echo

Gloucestershire Echo

THOUSANDS of low-income families and disabled people across Gloucestershire are about to face a stark choice – pay up to £1,000 more rent, or move house.

The 'bedroom tax' is due to come into force for housing association and council home tenants on April 1, and more than 3,000 families in the county will be affected.

They face paying £584 a year more rent if they have one 'spare' bedroom or £1,043 a year if they have two.

The change applies to all tenants of working age, including separated parents who share the care of their children, and disabled people who have their home specially adapted for their needs.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013

Gloucester City Homes, which manages 5,000 properties, said that 500 of its tenants will be affected.

"We are going to visit each one to personally explain the changes and try to help them, perhaps with a possible move to smaller home, if those properties are available," said chief executive Ashley Green.

Tenants will face tough choices and availability of homes will be a key issue.

Gloucester City Homes has a waiting list of 5,000. Tenants face a 14 per cent cut in their housing benefit if they are found to have one spare bedroom, or around £50 a month. The cut will be 25 per cent if they have two spare bedrooms.

"There's already a shortage of homes. It's not as easy as simply 'down-sizing'," said Mr Green. "There will be some who simply don't have that choice and will have to pay the extra rent or move into private rented accommodation."

Tenants facing extreme circumstances, including disabled people living in adapted homes can apply to their local council for Discretionary Housing Payments to make up some of the shortfall.

The National Housing Federation, which represents housing associations said 3,300 tenants in Gloucestershire will be affected, including 2,000 disabled people. The federation is calling on the Government for a rethink.

Catherine Brabner, of the National Housing Federation in the South West said: "The 'one-size-fits-all' approach takes no account of disabled people's adapted homes, or of parents sharing custody who will lose the room for their child at weekends.

"In most areas, there just aren't enough smaller affordable homes for these families to move into to avoid the tax. Many people will find themselves having to move into more expensive privately rented properties – adding to the overall housing benefit bill. The high housing benefit bill is because there are not enough affordable homes, so the best way to cut the bill is to build more."

19
Tweet this article
Report

19 Comments

  • Profile image for MissyMadDog

    by MissyMadDog

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 5:26PM

    “To say pensioners are exempt isn't strictly true, a couple with one over the age of 65 and one under 65 will have to pay up or move. Foster carers and parents who have adult children serving in the armed forces will now be exempt.
    There may be a discretionary fund but it's only £30m and people will only be allowed to apply 3 times I think and what if they're refused first time, especially those with severe disabilities unable to work, how are they supposed to pay the extra if no suitable accommodation can be found for them? How much will it cost to have properties adapted for those disabled who need specially adapted homes? Private rents are higher than social housing so there will be cases of say one person moving from a 2 bed social house to a 1 bed private property with higher rent. An ill thought out policy which will probably increase the housing bill, as well as debt and homelessness.”

  • Profile image for lemsip15

    by lemsip15

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 1:21PM

    “Ok Roses/Wombat...before you jump on you whiter than white, holier than thou, I've never set a foot wrong in my life, "I pay my taxes" rant...bare in mind that these changes do not only affect those who choose the "benefits lifestyle" but also those who have little choice in their situation. People with a disability have not had a choice in their condition, being disabled is not a "lifestyle choice". My mother is disabled and could be affected by this tax. She worked in the Police for a number of years and then for the local Council for years after that before being laid off because of her illness. She has paid her taxes and is entitled to homing and space to kept the equipment she needs without being charged extra for the privilage. I can guarantee you that she (and, I suspect, a fair number of others in her situation) would much rather be out earning money and paying taxes than being stuck in a wheelchair slowly losing control of her body. So before you throw out your rash generalisations about council tenants - think it through!!”

  • Profile image for honslknjklyt

    by honslknjklyt

    Monday, March 11 2013, 11:30PM

    “In a point made earlier, it was mentioned how the elderly might be very disturbed at having to move after living there for so many years.

    If we have a look at children today, the early years of a child are the formative years of their lives. For too long we have heard the ignorant statments of "oh, they;ll be alright" "kids are tougher than we think" the disregarding attitude of "kids are adaptable".

    Are they? We only have to look at children to see how troubled many of them are. They need their security, to have a home to call a home and to have familiarity.

    For a child to change schools for example can be one of the toughest times of a childs life. It is bad enough when they go up a year into the next class, and we all have to go through that and it is one of lifes lessons but to start a whole new school where no-one at all knows you and everybody else seems to know each other can be awful.

    It is not just the elderly who are affected should they have to move.”

  • Profile image for dearyme

    by dearyme

    Monday, March 11 2013, 10:17PM

    “Bigmo is partly right. According to the Housing Act 1985 [http://tinyurl.com/cq4ec7s], a room which is 50 sq ft or more, but less than 70 sq ft, is classed as suitable for a child between the ages of 1 and 10. [Para's 2a and 3b, table ii.”

  • Profile image for MrGarnet

    by MrGarnet

    Monday, March 11 2013, 8:51PM

    “Well with "social Housing" I can see the reasoning to match people up with appropriate sized properties.
    But I don't think it is fair to take money before being offered suitable accommodation?”

  • Profile image for honslknjklyt

    by honslknjklyt

    Monday, March 11 2013, 8:35PM

    “Being a pensioner does not mean being on the breadline.

    Just like being disabled does not mean being on the breadline.

    Many pensioners can afford to pay.”

  • Profile image for amy86

    by amy86

    Monday, March 11 2013, 8:02PM

    “Although a lot of elderly people are living in properties with more bedrooms than they need, can you imagine the stress this would put a lot of them through if say, you have an 80 year old who has lived in the same house 50 years suddenly being asked to up and move to a different property possibly away from all they know? It would probably do more harm than good for the sake of an extra bedroom.

    It is however a good idea for general working age people over-occupying properties when so many cant find suitable accommodation. I see they make no mention of the £500 incentive they were offering tenants to move to smaller accommodation though, and just scaremongering about the extra rent? Its a tenants choice to stay or go, so if they chose to stay, they pay an extra £16/week. Not exactly much for an extra room.”

  • Profile image for honslknjklyt

    by honslknjklyt

    Monday, March 11 2013, 6:36PM

    “Pity the boxroom thing doesn't apply with private tennants. There are "bedrooms" that fit a wardrobe, a single bed and a small chest of draws, nothing else aside maybe a bin - if you put that bin on top of the chest of draws! Yet they charge rents because they consider it a bedroom.

    What is the difference? It is still a room. If a private landlord thinks its a room and charges for it then why shouldn't social housing?”

  • Profile image for Bigmo

    by Bigmo

    Monday, March 11 2013, 6:20PM

    “OK PEOPLE LISTEN UP ( BEDROOM TAX ) IF YOUR SMALL BEDROOM IS 70 SQ FT OR UNDER IT IS CLASSED AS A BOXROOM THEREFOR CANNOT BE CHARGED BEDROOM TAX , THIS IS LISTED UNDER THE HOUSING ACT 1985 SECTION 326 , PLEASE USE THIS DO NOT TAKE ANY EXCUSES FROM THE COUNCIL AS THE HOUSING ACT 1985 CAN NOT BE CHANGED BY LAW .
    PLEASE MEASURE YOUR ROOM AND PUT YOUR FOOT DOWN AS THEY HAVEN'T A LEG TO STAND ON , I PUT THIS TO THEM TODAY AND I AM RIGHT , ( 63sq ft is 9ft x 7ft )

    http://tinyurl.com/a8y9yvb

  • Profile image for honslknjklyt

    by honslknjklyt

    Monday, March 11 2013, 5:49PM

    “What I find sickening is not only the fact that pensioners are not affected (no doubt this is because the tories don't want to lose the grey vote, so they get to keep their 3 bed house for 1 person) but also the fact that I work very hard and trying to save for a deposit. I am in my forties with a private landlord and it seems like I will never get there.

    So I am paying a higher rent as I am paying my landlords mortgage, I am also subsidising others including pensioners to stay in these houses and also funding THEIR right to buy, when I will never have such protection. I could get turfed out with a months notice! What about our security and right to call a house a home?

    Private tennants are at the bottom rung of the ladder, subsidising others while trying to get on the moving step.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article