BREAKING NEWS
 

Use for incinerator's excess heat energy still to be determined

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Profile image for Gloucestershire Echo

Gloucestershire Echo

SHIRE Hall bosses still do not know how to make use of the excess heat energy generated by the proposed incinerator at Javelin Park.

Gloucestershire County Council and Urbaser Balfour Beatty (UBB), the company behind the facility, have been looking at how to use of the energy.

But so far they have not been able to set any plans in concrete.

The planned incinerator will produce 116,000 megawatt hours of electricity per year by burning waste – enough energy to power 25,000 homes.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

A small amount of this electricity will be used to power the incinerator site, while the remainder will be sold by the council to the National Grid.

But the incinerator will also generate heat energy and a question mark still remains over how it can be used.

The authority said UBB is looking at finding ways for industry to use the energy.

Councillor Chas Fellows (C, Chalford), cabinet member for economy and environment, said: "At the moment we don't appear to have anyone willing to sign on."

Councillor Sarah Lunnon (Green, Stroud East) believed the issue needed to be resolved to ensure the incinerator, if it is built, is efficient.

She said: "There is no heat user at Javelin Park and that is one of the issues that has been raised.

"If we are going to burn residual waste, it seems to me that we should use all of the energy that we generate from that process and that includes the heat.

"My feeling is that if the facility is to be built, it should be built to be as efficient as possible.

"If there is no end user for the heat, the fact is the plant will be less efficient than if there was a heat user."

A spokeswoman for Urbaser Balfour Beatty added: "The facility has been designed so that heat generated by the process can be captured and used by neighbouring and local developments should the opportunities arise, meaning more efficient use can be made of the energy contained in the waste.

"Looking to the future, we are also considering how the facility can be made ready for new developments, ensuring that opportunities for low cost, low carbon heat energy are available throughout its life."

2
Tweet this article
Report

2 Comments

  • Profile image for Shireresident

    by Shireresident

    Thursday, January 31 2013, 6:49PM

    “Sounds like the council is just grabbing the opportunity for a fast buck without sorting out all the environmental details. Not a surprise really is it folks?”

  • Profile image for QuedgeleyGuy

    by QuedgeleyGuy

    Thursday, January 31 2013, 8:05AM

    “Heat Pollution is just one of many reasons that this plant is the wrong thing in the wrong place.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article