'We are still at risk from flooding' - with video

Trusted article source icon
Monday, July 20, 2009
Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

This is Gloucestershire

If rain fell at the levels of July 20, 2007 today, Gloucestershire would still be at great risk of flooding.

That is the verdict of the man in charge of flood risk planning for Gloucestershire County Council on the two year anniversary of the crisis.

On that day, the deluge saw three times the average month's rain in 17 hours falling on already sodden ground following flooding the month before.

It cost three people their lives and saw more than 5,000 houses flooded.

Mark Parker, the council's head of flood risk management, said the local authority has done a lot to improve the situation, but more money was needed.

"Gloucestershire will never be free of the risk of flooding," he said.

"We'd be able to do much more than we are doing if we had enough money."

In June 2008, a report into the floods by Sir Michael Pitt claimed the county was not prepared for the deluge. It came up with more than 90 recommendations for action such as tackling surface water flooding and better weather prediction.

Mr Parker and John Parsons, principal flood risk management officer, said they have achieved much of what the report had asked but would like it to go further.

"We'd like this to become legislation, we would like a flood bill to set out responsibilities and identifies who does what with flood risk," Mr Parker said.

Most of the work carried out by the council was described as 'putting our own house in order'.

Mr Parker said 135,000 drain gullies on the county's roads were now being cleared once a year with those likely to flood being cleared three times a year.

He added: "The infrastructure is insufficient to cope with the rains of 2007 but we need to make sure it is as ready as it can be. A total of 6,000 blockages were cleared last year."

In addition to clearing its own highways, the council worked with the Environment Agency and district councils.

The county council gave £1-million to district councils for small waterway, schemes such as the Saintbridge Balancing Ponds in Gloucester.

Mr Parsons said the council co-ordinated bids for money to protect homes. A total of £68,000 was given by the Government for houses in Sandhurst.

The rainfall caused major flash flooding devastating homes and businesses and a plan to look at surface water management is now being developed.

The first management plan covers a small area of Gloucester. Modelling where surface water will run needs very precise knowledge looking into minute detail even down to kerb heights.

"It needs more technical work than we initially thought. In order to cover everywhere in Gloucestershire likely to flood, 30 or 40 plans would be needed," Mr Parker said.

But he said more money would help to get the work done and a 'proper discussion' about the responsibilities coming their way in the flood bill was needed.

He also said there needed to be 'absolute clarity' about power and funding.

"We spent £8-million on flood risk management last year and £4-million this year. Really I'd want to spend £5-million a year for the next five years to allow us to do everything we could do at the moment," Mr Parker said.

But he added residents should not expect all work to be done by councils.

He said: "We'd want householders to help us by doing what they can to protect properties against flooding, and so if it does flood that it can recover quickly."

In 2007, after the initial flooding came the danger of rising water levels on the River Severn.

Mythe water plant at Tewkesbury flooded leaving 150,000 houses without water for two weeks.

The Army and emergency services fought a desperate battle to protect the Walham electricity substation in Gloucester. Only inches stood in the way of hundreds of thousands of homes losing power.

Major rivers are the responsibility of the Environment Agency. Flood risk manager for its west and midlands branch Anthony Perry said: "If the same conditions happened again then some areas would face the same risk but in others we'd be in much better shape.

"The major urban centres of Gloucester and Cheltenham are much better protected but it's more patchy in the rural areas."

Mr Perry said one important scheme was flood protection of houses in Cypress Gardens, Longlevens, after Horsbere Brook burst its banks.

He added: "We demolished a bridge and built a flood barrier around the edge of the estate. There have been five near misses since then, but I'm confident that on those of those occasions the houses would have flooded if the work hadn't been done."

Another area of improvement he said was helping emergency services and local authorities be prepared.

He said: "We've worked with the Met Office to set up the National Flood Forecasting Centre, which began in April, which gives information to emergency planners much quicker than before."

Last week, heavy rain fell and the Agency sent details 24 hours in advance.

Two years on, it seems lessons have been learned but messages left on our website over the weekend show the fear and anger many people are still feeling.

They are calling for answers and for more work to be done. One message simply read: "I never want to have to go through that again."

IT has been two years since residents in Evergreen Walk were forced to leave their homes after Horsbere Brook burst its banks.

Although everyone is back in the Longlevens street, the scars of July 2007 are still felt.

Ben Kemp was just five when his home was swamped with water but he still remembers it well.

His mum, Vicky, 29, said the seven-year-old is still worried when it rains.

"My youngest son Matthew was very, very small at the time and he thought it was great," she said.

"He was carried out on a fireman's shoulders and he loved it but Ben didn't like it at all, he knew what was going on.

"He is still very conscious of what happened, you notice it with little things like the way he always takes his toys upstairs."

Now eight months pregnant with her third child, Vicky is one of many people who have signed up to the Environment Agency's flood warning scheme which alerts residents about any rising water levels in the area.

She has also installed flood doors in the home she shares with partner Jason Curnow.

Vicky said she is pleased with the service plus the new hi-tech warning system in Horsbere Brook.

Neil Anderson, director of SSGUK.com which installed the system, said the monitor would assess water levels and send live information to anyone who needed it.

For Vicky it is about peace of mind. "They have not been tested out," she said. "But at least we are trying to do something.

"There are times when you think 'oh I can't be bothered, I want to move' but then you realise that all your neighbours and friends are here.

"The one main thing that has come out of this is the fact we have come together as a community in the past two years. Before I only knew the people either side of me, now I know all my neighbours."

8
Tweet this article
Report

8 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by In at the deep end., Longford, Gloucester

    Monday, July 27 2009, 6:56PM

    “Our house was badly flooded in July 2007. We were rescued by the RNLI who told us it would not be wise to stay put. I will never forget being without electricity or water or the long and arduous aftermath to return our house to some normality. This included six months in a caravan which is not much fun in the winter months. I will never forget what happened. Our solution: rely on the authorities? rely on the drains, brooks and rivers to be cleared? rely on county flood defences? No - we can't wait for the authorities to do the right thing or believe that they will listen to our real issues - as we know they are happy to build on the flood plain in Longford very near to where we live. We have therefore had no choice but to take matters into our own hands and are now building an extension on stilts to house a new kitchen and lounge upstairs. We feel that this in the only way we can be safe and healthy when the 'rains come' next time. Anyone who lives in Longford is welcome to join us on higher ground when it does!!! We are thinking of changing the name of our house to Deep End.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Shaun Shute, Gloucester

    Tuesday, July 21 2009, 3:20PM

    “Remember, the council had the money stashed away in Icelandic banks for a rainy day. They had the money all long but claimed poverty when the rains came.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by frank jrn, glos

    Tuesday, July 21 2009, 11:58AM

    “must agree with disco gloucester iv been outside just now the drains are full of leaves and rubbish thrown from passing cars be on the phone to GCC about the state of the drain in the road was told we will send some one out next week if you.re lucky as we are short of staff ...hoildays sickness etc. well im in longlevens god help us”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Mandy, Somewhere a lot safer than before

    Monday, July 20 2009, 8:52PM

    “Ah, 2 years on and STILL people are moaning about how Cypress Gardens residents got better treatment than they did. If you live in a 3 year old estate, you expect it to have been planned out and built according to those plans. That aside, maybe the media focussed on CG because the council planners felt guilty about allowing the houses to be built on floodplans in the first place; or because they knew the flood was a "when not if" event; or that the builders dumped all rubble in the drains rather than skips. And not that it happened just once, like in most places, but yet again one month later. I am more annoyed that people who were insured had to wait ages for their incompetent insurance companies to drag out settlements, whereas people who couldn't be bothered to get insurance cos "it would never happen to them" were insultingly bailed out by people and even had their houses done up on DIY SOS! THAT is something to get annoyed about.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Disco, Gloucester

    Monday, July 20 2009, 6:39PM

    “Next time you're walking down the street, take a look in the drain and tell me if you think anything has been learnt. Are the waterways being dredged?”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Brian, Gloucester

    Monday, July 20 2009, 5:06PM

    “Some areas will always be at risk of flodding no matter how much money is thrown at them. It could be better to pay off residents of places like Cypress Gardens with the market value of their homes, bulldoze the houses and just let the land flood. This could work out cheaper long-term. the same goes for other dodgy developments. Otherwise we're going to be throwing more good money after bad. Flood defence money will be cut still further under a conservative Government who don't wnat to fund the EA or anyone else to do this work. So alternatives need to be found, especially with the tories coming.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Andy, A forgotten part of Gloucester

    Monday, July 20 2009, 4:43PM

    “No suprise at the Citizen biase to Cypress Garden. I agree with the previous comments and now wish I had bought a house in Cypress Gardens, that way we would not have to live with the fear of flooding again. Who is fighting our cause..... NO ONE as we are all resigned to the fact that no one in the council or E.A, cares
    and no amount of lobbying, letters, meetings has done anything to improve the situation.
    It would be interesting to see an independent audit on the amount of money spent on Cypress Gardens compared to other areas.
    Also why have other areas had to wait for the mapping to be done by the E.A. before any work is considered? Wheras Cypress Gardens, not only jumped the queue, they soared over it.
    I do not ever expect a straight and honest answer from either the council or the E.A. especially from the E.A. who have made all the 'right noises' and promises to do something, but to date....nothing!
    I am pleased for Cypress Gardens, their properties probably have more value now and people can move, due to the works carried out, but for alot of us, we cannot sell our houses, the values have dropped and insurances have gone up.
    All this because we did not court the publicity at the time.
    We learn from our mistakes or you would think so, but judging by some of the decisions to keep building on flood risk areas, I doubt it.”

  • Profile image for This is Gloucestershire

    by Chris, Gloucester

    Monday, July 20 2009, 1:23PM

    “Yes there will always be a risk of flooding in some areas of Gloucestershire whatever measures are taken.
    Mistakes have already been made with some previous planning consents.
    But we could stop the risk becoming greater by refusing future planning in and near flood prone areas.
    One example is the proposal for Longlevens, which is also in Greenbelt.
    Allow building development like this and future floods will effectively be man made disasters.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters