Have your say on county council spending
CASH-STRAPPED council bosses on the brink of making major savings are asking Echo readers to help set priorities.
In the face of council tax freezes and cuts from central Government, Gloucestershire County Council plans to make £29 million of savings in 2012/13, as part of the £114m it is trying to save by 2014.
-

Councillor Ray Theodoulou
But Councillor Ray Theodoulou, cabinet member for finance and change, yesterday insisted the aim was to protect all front-line services.
He said: "We're not planning dramatic cuts. Most of the pain will have come last year. There will be reductions to certain budgets, but nothing like with the libraries and youth service last year. We aim to provide a basic but good quality service and, to an extent, that has to be supplemented by working with local charities and others in the voluntary sector.
"Our message to people is tell us what your solutions might be."
He said adult social care was a particular concern for the council as the cost of looking after an increasingly aging population continued to increase.
He said: "We still need to make the savings. We need to find ways of doing that which will help us not impact on frontline services."
He added: "We have already delivered on our promise to save £30m last year, but the cheque we get from the Government is smaller again in 2012. This means making savings wherever we can and prioritising our spending on the services people most need.
"Before we make any decisions, we need to know what residents think about our proposals and I'd encourage as many people as possible to have their say. Between now and January 18 you can feedback directly to the council."
People can take part online at www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/budget2012 or can fill in the form that appears on pages 20 and 21 of today's Echo.
The consultation follows the cabinet having agreed a draft budget for 2012/13 of £389.94m, which represents a decrease in cash terms of £6.2m or 1.6 per cent. It includes there being no increase in council tax as the Government is to award a one-off grant to all local authorities that freeze council tax increases for the next financial year.
Shire Hall is into the second year of a four-year plan, called Meeting the Challenge, to save £114m due to cuts in Government funding.
HAVE YOUR SAY ON BUDGET PRIORITIES, P20-21







17 Comments
View all
by Shireresident
Thursday, December 22 2011, 10:34PM
“Pointless responding to sham consultations like this. The Cabinet will just go into a huddle and come up with the answer they first thought of.”
by grannieannie2
Thursday, December 22 2011, 6:03PM
“Sorry, can you replace thing for think..............doh, back to school!”
by grannieannie2
Thursday, December 22 2011, 6:01PM
“First we had 'building our future' now we have 'meeting the challenge'. Does Mark Hawthorne really thing the people of Gloucestershire are stupid enough to fill in questionaires that, ultimately, he will wave in their faces when it all goes wrong, again, telling us ' We only did what the people wanted/prioritised/asked for!!”
by capital1978
Thursday, December 22 2011, 5:40PM
“jeff
have you talked to Gloucestershire First? Would seem to be the best place to go”
by jeff_mowatt
Thursday, December 22 2011, 4:40PM
“I didn't ask for any money. I operate a self-sustaining social business which does not depend on grants.
As you may see, at the district level in answer to a question I raised, there is no policy for this kind of business and I suspect the same will be found at the county level.
http://tinyurl.com/ce97smc
This means that for the purpose of promoting localism, the other hand of these funding custs, those that could help stimulate the local economy are simply shut out.”
by capital1978
Thursday, December 22 2011, 4:27PM
“Jeff
Seems like you are just complaining because they didn't give you any money”
by jeff_mowatt
Thursday, December 22 2011, 3:51PM
“It's the lack of democratic process which concerns me. For example in my communication to a county councillor on the failure to support local business which re-invest in the community. I was asking why those doing these things with their own profits are pushed aside by a quango which is both inexperienced and dependent on public funding.
Needless to say it fell on the deaf ears of all but one Independent district councillor it was copied to:
http://tinyurl.com/442ppzh”
by capital1978
Thursday, December 22 2011, 1:53PM
“I agree it isn't a good set of questions. "Do you agree with these platitudes" is about it.”
by ablokehere
Thursday, December 22 2011, 12:06PM
“The council defines a casual contract as one where it is not obliged to offer work or the individual to accept it. So they havent really been re employed”
by Lecorche
Thursday, December 22 2011, 11:40AM
“http://tinyurl.com/bsk9pjo”